Governance, risk and compliance reviews, grounded in your own sources
Normain reads your standards, policies and client evidence and returns structured, verifiable answers, each one linked to the exact clause it came from. Your team reviews and signs off in a fraction of the time.
From client policies to a gap report in one run
Map the policies to Annex A, check the Statement of Applicability against that mapping, then write the gap report. Each step builds on the one before, and every gap links back to the clause or cell it came from.
Click any step to open it, or any citation to jump to the source it came from. Press Run to watch the steps feed each other.

Instruction
Write a gap report in Word from 01Map the policies to Annex A and 02Find the gaps, using 01. One section per gap with the control, what is missing and the evidence to ask for.
Result
Wrote ISO 27001 gap report.docx (3 pages). It covers the 3 gaps from step 02, starting with the backup conflict because internal audit has already raised it.
ISO 27001 gap report: Northwind Logistics
A.8.13 Information backup
The SoA records 90-day backup retention.
Policy §9.4 sets 30 days.
Ask for the backup job settings and agree which period is correct.
A.5.23 Cloud services
Marked implemented in the SoA with no supporting policy.
Ask for the cloud provider list and any cloud security standard in use.
A.8.28 Secure coding
Partially implemented, no document referenced. Ask for the development standard or code review procedure.
Recognize the work you do every day
These are the reviews GRC teams run by hand today: the same documents, the same questions, the same matrices. Normain does the reading and gives you structured, cited answers to check and sign off.
Framework gap analysis
Assess your current state against a target framework, control by control, and produce the gap matrix that feeds your Statement of Applicability and remediation roadmap.
- For every control assessed as partially implemented, identify the specific sub-requirement not met and cite the evidence reviewed.
- Which controls satisfy both ISO 27001:2022 Annex A and the SOC 2 Common Criteria, so we can consolidate to a single control statement?
- Where a control is applicable but no implementing policy exists, flag it as a documentation gap and propose a remediation owner.
- Which 2022 Annex A controls are new versus our previous SoA, and are they addressed?
Third-party and vendor risk
Review each vendor's evidence against the same checklist, so onboarding and periodic re-reviews take minutes instead of an afternoon of reading each report.
- From the test-of-controls table, list every control with an exception, the auditor's testing method, and management's response.
- Which subservice organizations are carved out, and do any of them process our regulated data?
- Extract the Complementary User Entity Controls (CUECs) we must implement, and map each to an internal owner.
- Does the coverage period leave any gap since the previous report, and is the ISO certificate in scope and valid?
Policy and control framework review
Ask a set of pointed questions across your policy library at once, to prove coverage, catch contradictions, and find what is overdue for review.
- Does our Access Control Policy require phishing-resistant MFA for privileged access, and which clause states it?
- Which framework requirements have no backing policy clause?
- Where do two policies conflict, for example on password length or data retention?
- Which policies are past their stated review date as of today?
Testimonials
Trusted by GRC teams
When the question is the same across hundreds of files
Some GRC work is one structured question asked at scale. Analysis types answer it across a stack of policies, once per supplier assessment, or across a whole control matrix, with a citation behind every answer.
See it on your own documents
Bring a standard and a client file. In minutes, watch Normain work through them with the reasoning and citations in view, all the way to cited answers you can sign off on.








